ln(7x+4)-ln(2)=2ln(x)

Simple and best practice solution for ln(7x+4)-ln(2)=2ln(x) equation. Check how easy it is, and learn it for the future. Our solution is simple, and easy to understand, so don`t hesitate to use it as a solution of your homework.

If it's not what You are looking for type in the equation solver your own equation and let us solve it.

Solution for ln(7x+4)-ln(2)=2ln(x) equation:


Simplifying
ln(7x + 4) + -1ln(2) = 2ln(x)

Reorder the terms:
ln(4 + 7x) + -1ln(2) = 2ln(x)
(4 * ln + 7x * ln) + -1ln(2) = 2ln(x)
(4ln + 7lnx) + -1ln(2) = 2ln(x)

Reorder the terms for easier multiplication:
4ln + 7lnx + -1 * 2ln = 2ln(x)

Multiply -1 * 2
4ln + 7lnx + -2ln = 2ln(x)

Reorder the terms:
4ln + -2ln + 7lnx = 2ln(x)

Combine like terms: 4ln + -2ln = 2ln
2ln + 7lnx = 2ln(x)

Multiply ln * x
2ln + 7lnx = 2lnx

Solving
2ln + 7lnx = 2lnx

Solving for variable 'l'.

Move all terms containing l to the left, all other terms to the right.

Add '-2lnx' to each side of the equation.
2ln + 7lnx + -2lnx = 2lnx + -2lnx

Combine like terms: 7lnx + -2lnx = 5lnx
2ln + 5lnx = 2lnx + -2lnx

Combine like terms: 2lnx + -2lnx = 0
2ln + 5lnx = 0

Factor out the Greatest Common Factor (GCF), 'ln'.
ln(2 + 5x) = 0

Subproblem 1

Set the factor 'ln' equal to zero and attempt to solve: Simplifying ln = 0 Solving ln = 0 Move all terms containing l to the left, all other terms to the right. Simplifying ln = 0 The solution to this equation could not be determined. This subproblem is being ignored because a solution could not be determined.

Subproblem 2

Set the factor '(2 + 5x)' equal to zero and attempt to solve: Simplifying 2 + 5x = 0 Solving 2 + 5x = 0 Move all terms containing l to the left, all other terms to the right. Add '-2' to each side of the equation. 2 + -2 + 5x = 0 + -2 Combine like terms: 2 + -2 = 0 0 + 5x = 0 + -2 5x = 0 + -2 Combine like terms: 0 + -2 = -2 5x = -2 Add '-5x' to each side of the equation. 5x + -5x = -2 + -5x Combine like terms: 5x + -5x = 0 0 = -2 + -5x Simplifying 0 = -2 + -5x The solution to this equation could not be determined. This subproblem is being ignored because a solution could not be determined. The solution to this equation could not be determined.

See similar equations:

| 5-n/3=4 | | x+29=99 | | [(9+8)+2]-1= | | y+12=-1(x+2) | | j(x)=4x-13+11 | | 7-5b=-23 | | 475/250 | | 3b+5=6 | | c*c=169 | | 6x-9=-18 | | -1/5p+9/5p+6=30 | | x^2+12x+92=0 | | z/27=63 | | (9+8)+(2-1)= | | 1/5p+9/5p+6=30 | | 4y-6.2=13 | | -2x^2+8x-12= | | -4z+8=12 | | Z-5/4=28 | | 3/8b+18=-2/1/4 | | Y+12+3y+8=180 | | 14b=16(6+12) | | 16/21=x/100 | | 3x+2.5=6.1 | | 16616.88=2*3.14*r^2+2*3.14*r*105 | | 5[9-5n]-7=-38 | | 4y/5=28 | | b*b=225 | | 7a+b=10 | | Ln(7x-12)=lnx | | 7(6)-3(3)=x | | 3x^2+-17x+10=0 |

Equations solver categories